jump to navigation

Kobe Bryant and Occam’s Razor May 31, 2007

Posted by rosolio in Basketball, Los Angeles, Media.
add a comment

The term ‘Conspiracy Theory’ carries a hell of a stigma. The first image conjured is usually that of the Kennedy Assassination, the rumors of alien landings at Roswell, and a remarkably horrible movie starring a pre-Himmler Mel Gibson. That history forces all logical theories under the umbrella of the insane. Well here’s one that’s not: Kobe Bryant meant exactly what he said when he requested a trade from the Lakers.

conspiracy theory

“Why would he do that?” gasp the talking heads on the ESPN channel fleet. “He’s the most marketable star in the second largest market in the country!” Okay, so we’ve eliminated one possibility: exposure.

kobe

It rarely makes sense to listen to someone’s explanation because most people lie, especially when it involves their career or money, but what the hell. Kobe’s demand for a trade came as part of a yelling match with the David Carradine of raising one’s voice, Stephen A. Smith. He claimed to be angry that he wasn’t getting any help from the front office, that they weren’t committed to surrounding him with championship caliber talent. That makes sense, considering that Kobe has been surrounded by young players such as Andrew Bynum and Kwame Brown. But then you recall Kobe’s part in running Shaquille O’Neal out of town. So that’s out; Kobe doesn’t want to share the spotlight.

It could be that Bryant’s having trouble with Head Coach Phil Jackson again. Jackson killed him in his book, calling Kobe “uncoachable.” Who can blame him there? There isn’t a point to drawing up a triangle offense with five players involved if one of them refuses to pass the ball. But Kobe has thrived under Jackson, and they’ve seemed to have buried the hatchet as the Zen Master still roams the bench at the Staples Center.

Wait…it’s got to be money. Hang on,…Kobe netted $17 million this season. Scratch that.

Well, those are the reasons that The Artist Formerly Known As Number Eight would want to leave the Lakers. What did I miss?

The Lottery…the NBA Draft Lottery.

The Celtics, Hawks, and Sixers all had a shot to land Kevin Durant or Greg Oden in the lottery, but the coveted top picks were swiped by Portland and Seattle of the Pacific Northwest. With the exception of LeBron James, all of the league’s stars are buried west of the Eastern Time Zone. The aforementioned Shaq is the beginning and end of the star power out East, and his time is quickly drawing to a close. Sure, Paul Pierce and Gilbert Arenas are big time players, but you don’t see either of them doing Sprite ads anytime soon. No one transcends the sport out there.

And the league is dying because of it.

oden

Boston and New York used to be die-hard hotbeds. Between the Boston Garden and the hallowed MSG, some of the most devoted fans called the East home. People whine about an East Coast bias in sports, look at the results of the major cities on the Atlantic Coast this season:
Washington: 41-41
Philadelphia: 35-47
New York: 33-49
Atlanta: 30-52
Boston: 24-58

Of those teams, only Washington made the playoffs, and they were dead men walking with Arenas out.

The NHL moved Wayne Gretzky to Los Angeles to build the league out West. The NBA was banking on an Oden or Durant (or both) to bring save the league back East. And while they could be great players, Corey Brewer, Jeff Green, and Joakim Noah aren’t going to do that. Kobe Bryant, on the other hand…

Everyone was looking for a sequel to the famed “Frozen Envelope” draft that landed Patrick Ewing in America’s number one market. I wouldn’t be surprised in David Stern had a hand in getting one of the league’s best players out of American’s runner-up.

Even though he’s in a gigantic market, Bryant is quickly losing star-ground to fellow westerners Steve Nash and Dirk Nowitzki. That will only increase with the addition of Oden and Durant to Pacific Standard Time. In a coast devoid of star power, however, imagine how bright Kobe’s could shine.

I guess the truth really is in the first place you look.

Follow the Worldwide Leader June 20, 2006

Posted by rosolio in Baseball, Basketball, Football, Hockey, TV.
add a comment

First, we are going to open with a disclaimer: I am as addicted to ESPN as anyone else. I check the website a hundred times a day. Upon moving to the midwest and being out of the range of my beloved PTI, I’ve begun downloading the podcast and listening a day late. I have this weird feeling that watching a Stanley Cup Playoff game on OLN somehow isn’t as valid as if it was on ESPN, even though it’s the exact same people with the exact same haircuts. ESPN, a jewel in the crown of the Disney empire, has an absolute hidden monopoly on everything revolving around sports.

The term ‘Empire’ carries fantastically negative connotations. It feels weird to write ‘Empire’ and not capitalize it. This is due to the fact that most are not recognized as Empires until it becomes evil. ESPN has not always been bad, but it is this author’s intention to, at least in some way, shine light on a negative trend that is spiraling uncontrollably toward disaster. Picture a volkswagen on fire careening down a street in San Francisco toward a crowded intersection. A little intense, but so is Around The Horn.

Like it was written in Revelation, the sports apocalypse starts with a positive event (I clearly follow the bible intently…anyway). Pardon the Interruption features two of the greatest sports writers (frankly, two of the greatest columnists regardless of subject) this country has to offer: the Old Tyme [sic] sportsfan Tony Kornheiser and the plugged-in, X’s and O’s Michael Wilbon. The idea was that these two very different, but very smart, writers would address the various events of the sports day and argue their opinions. Part of the appeal was that these two colleagues are very good friends, and the dynamic in a way simulates any group of fans discussing the same topics. They don’t claim to be experts, but neither do we, really. I can get in a trench war over whether the 2000 Ravens or 1985 Bears had a more fearsome defense, but unless I’m arguing with Buddy Ryan, neither I nor my adversary has any actual cred that makes us ‘right’. It’s still fun to debate, however, and that’s why PTI is so great.

The problem is that ESPN, through the Nielsen ratings and internet buzz, saw that they had a gigantic hit on their hands; a lively, opinionated sportspage that contrasted directly with the objective, just the facts ma’am Sportscenter. The suits at Team Rodent completely missed the boat as to why PTI is so popular. Rather than seeing the everyday banter of the show, the producers instead took the ratings to mean that audiences wanted to see people fight.

Around the Horn soon premiered: the Game of Competitive Banter. Aside from being advertised as a competition and the constant ad hominem attacks from the ‘contestants’, the show’s real flaw was that through the assignment of points, someone was going to be decided to have been right. Former host Max Kellerman wasn’t shy about mentioning his New York bias, and it showed in his assignment of points. The show has improved with current host Tony Reali as it seems that points are assigned based on argument and stat inclusion. But there are three types of lies, and the show still yielded a winner.

Dozens of other headache-inducing shows and segments featuring talking heads yelling at each other soon followed, but that wasn’t the real problem. The charm of PTI was that Kornheiser and Wilbon would occassionally take ludicrously bold sides, because the idea was to facilitate discussion, and plus it can be funny. It was because of this reason that asinine segments such as the Budweiser Hot Seat came to pass. Dan Patrick would ask pointed and directly controversial questions to athletes and sports personalities, seemingly begging for the person to slip and say something controversial. A classic example occurred with Jeremy Roenick. After being asked about the fans who claim they’ll never watch hockey again after the lockout, Roenick answered very honestly, “Hey, if they don’t want to watch, whatever, good riddance.” Following the interview, a thousand online and televised segments announced that “Roenick does not care about fans!” Patrick claimed total ignorance of the situation, but he threw the bear trap down and Roenick stepped into it. It is also worth mentioning that the rise of PTI changed Patrick’s radio program, which went from witty banter between he and ex-pitcher Rob Dibble, to Patrick’s controversy-stirring rants defended oh so smugly with the “It’s just my opinion” defense.

Patrick is right, it is just his opinion. He’s just another guy, with no more cred than someone working at Walgreens. He’s never stepped on a field of any kind. And that’s why I cut him a lot of slack and listened loyally to his show. I also listened to Colin Cowherd, who followed a similarly abrasive formula.

And then it became clear to me. Cowherd was on one of his rants, screaming about why Americans love the frontrunners and hate underdogs. This is completely insane, of course, as anyone outside of the five boroughs would say that the Miracle on Ice was a greater event than the 2000 Yankees rolling over everyone on the way to a title. His logic was that more people watch when the Yankees and Dukies and Fighting Irish are playing. He also supports Rush Limbaugh, which is a great way to retain listeners, because he makes a lot of money. It’s debatable as to whether Cowherd even likes sports; he certainly hates athletes and reminds his audience daily of all the reasons you should hate them. The problem with The Herd, and it took a long time to decipher, was that Cowherd wasn’t telling you what he thought. He was telling you what YOU thought. And as I looked more and more, I saw a thousand examples all over the place where ESPN was dictating the sports world by telling people what they were thinking.

What?

There is a lot of great stuff on ESPN. Mike & Mike on ESPN radio is great, PTI is great, Chris Mortensen simply has more information than every other football reporter on the planet, and Bill Simmons relates to more fans my age than anyone else out there.

But ESPN waxes poetic about how outraged America is over Barry Bonds and then unleashes a Bonds reality show. They create the Minnesota Vikings Love Boat Scandal; you mean insanely rich people fuck insanely hot strippers on boats? Whaaaaat? Or the Randy Moss mooning incident, or the constant Terrell Owens coverage, or entire days dedicated to the Yankees and Red Sox who play 30 times a season.

ESPN does all of this under the guise of “We’re giving the people what they want.” The reality is closer to this, “We’re telling the people want they want and then giving it to them.”

That’s what media has become. We dreamed of it becoming more inclusive with added interactivity and all of that, but instead of us reaching to them, they’ve reached us. Through weblogs and focus groups and polls, they can monitor their progress. Based on the fact that I checked ESPN.com three times while writing this, they’re doing a pretty good job.

The Truth about Duke March 29, 2006

Posted by rosolio in Basketball, Common Sense, Racism.
add a comment

Now, my well-documented opinion regarding Duke University could easily be boiled down to my distain for their basketball team if one so desired. It is very easy to take everything I say and toss it under the umbrella of, “Oh, it’s a Maryland fan looking for additional, albeit unnecessary, reasons to hate his ACC rival.” That’s totally fine and, to be honest, it does factor in a tiny bit (it has to). But the fact of the matter is that my distaste ventures far beyond the basketball court and what Dookies across the nation would refer to as “petty jealousy.”

For one thing, I know these people a lot better than most outside of Durham, having grown up in the Baltimore private school scene. A collection of a number of small schools linked together by neighbors and sports created one giant graduating class, in a way. Like the students at Duke, our families were paying an exhorbant cost for our education. Like the students at Duke, we lived in a sort of isolated bubble, separated from the violent reality of our hometown. Smack dab on the Mason Dixon line, this collective was a perfect blend of New England prep school and Old South parochialism (don’t get me wrong, I really enjoyed my school and definitely have rose-colored glasses that tell me we were by far the most socially active and community serving member of this group. Maybe I’m biased, but it seems to be a general consensus). The fact of the matter is that very few people tried to understand the world outside the one of privilege, and those who did could hardly relate to it. The only reason my school could seem as being more aware revolves around a recent tragedy that very few other area private schools have experienced, but plagues the surrounding community on a daily basis.

My experience in this tightly-knit group paints a very specific picture of the kind of entitlement and invincibility that can hang over an institution like Duke. Dick Vitale and every Dookie on the planet will wax poetic about an elite institution full of some of the brightest young minds in the country, but they won’t bring up the $43,000 price tag that comes with it. That’s $6k a year more than Harvard and $4k more than Yale. There are students there on a financial aid, need-based and scholarship, but they are exceptions and not the rule.

The entitlement comes from a total lack of accountability for the full run of their lives. They get caught drinking and don’t pay the citation. They get DUIs and don’t spend the requisite night in the clink. They treat other people like they are less important not out of some kind of psychological fear or insecurity, but because they genuinely believe it. Why shouldn’t they? Their parents have kept them dodging bullets their whole lives, the same bullets they dodged when they were younger. It’s easy in a small community like Baltimore, or Durham, where all of the powerful people, and their kids, know each other. It sounds to be a regurgitation of a stereotype, but I’ve seen enough first-hand to know that it is backed up by legions of facts.

Now to the events of this week: I am doing my absolute best to keep “innocent until proven guilty” in my mind when it comes to the rape allegations. And I’m also doing my best to, if the charges turn out to be founded, blame the people and not the school. However, the dirty little secret is out of the bag and the hounds are getting released (hey hey, cliche).

The Raleigh News-Observer reported that 15 of the suspects (one-third) have been previously cited for alcohol and disturbing the peace. Sure, not a big deal, it happens to everyone. But these people weren’t punished: “The paper said that most of those charges were resolved in deals with prosecutors that allowed the players to escape criminal convictions.” So since there were no convictions, the University could leave its money-generating lacrosse team on the field. And they have total deniability. Throw in the fact that the attorney for the current suspects is a Duke Law alum from 2001 and the picture gets clearer and clearer: obviously, Luca Brasi wasn’t available. As bad as this would be for the players, who could do 25 to life (which is even longer for an upper-class suburban kid), it would be worse for the University, right in the bottom line, where it hurts them the most. We know why the students were bailed out of their charges; because a game in the L column costs the university money; an appearence in the NCAA lacrosse national championship is worth in excess of $1 million. Why let that slip away if you don’t have to? Needless to say, Duke officials are not investigating this case.

Duke is an environment where kids who have been given a free pass their entire lives can be guaranteed an extention of their invincibility, though numerous contacts and a diploma carrying a reputation inflated by years of careful manipulation and exploitation (whew, strong words). They charge an insane tuition that is essentially a buy-in fee to an alumni network designed to indefinitely line the pockets of university officials with no questions asked. If the truly gifted, intelligent students in Durham (I am aware that there are students who have earned their way in) want that immaculate reputation to hold its ground, they need to hold their community accountable for the culture of greed that it preaches.